Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S vs Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2
Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S has more in its favour on paper. The 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 gathers more light for low light and background blur; the Z 24-70mm f/4 S is cheaper. The Nikon lens is the mount maker's own, while the Tamron is a third-party alternative.
Choose the Z 24-70mm f/4 S for
- less weight (500g vs 540g)
- a lower price (about £320 vs £630)
- a wider starting focal length (24mm vs 28mm)
Choose the 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 for
- a brighter maximum aperture (f/2.8, about 1.0 stops more light)
- more reach (75mm vs 70mm)
| Z 24-70mm f/4 S | 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Nikon | Tamron |
| Focal length | 24-70mm | 28-75mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Weight | 500 g | 540 g |
| Stabilisation | No | No |
| Weather sealing | Yes | Yes |
| Filter size | 72mm | 67mm |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| New price | £499 | £749 |
| Used at MPB (Nikon Z) | £274–£374 | £604–£654 |
More lens comparisons
See all Nikon Z cameras and lenses.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S better than the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2?
The Z 24-70mm f/4 S offers less weight (500g vs 540g), a lower price (about £320 vs £630), a wider starting focal length (24mm vs 28mm); the 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 offers a brighter maximum aperture (f/2.8, about 1.0 stops more light), more reach (75mm vs 70mm).
Which is better value, the Z 24-70mm f/4 S or the 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2?
On Nikon Z, the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S costs about £320 against about £630 for the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 (MPB used where listed, otherwise new; checked 5 November 2026).
Is f/2.8 worth it over f/4?
f/2.8 gathers about 1.0 stops more light, which helps indoors, at night and for background blur. If you mostly shoot in good light, the slower lens is usually lighter and cheaper.
Do both lenses fit the same cameras?
Both are available for Nikon Z (and other mounts: Sony E / FE).