Camera comparison · updated 5 November 2026

Fujifilm X-T5 vs Sony Alpha A6700

Sony Alpha A6700 has the edge on paper, but the right choice depends on what you shoot. The X-T5 is the better pick for landscapes, a film look; the Alpha A6700 is better for wildlife, sports, vlogging.

Choose the X-T5 for

  • more resolution (40MP vs 26MP)
  • faster bursts (15fps vs 11fps)
  • a lower price (from £1,059)

Choose the Alpha A6700 for

  • faster sensor readout (≈20ms vs ≈55ms)
  • a lighter body (493g vs 557g)
  • stronger video (4K 120p (crop))
  • more lenses in our database (105 vs 36)
  • a newer design (2023)

Specs side by side

SpecX-T5Alpha A6700
SensorAPS-C, 40MPAPS-C, 26MP
MountFujifilm XSony E (APS-C)
Released20222023
Burst15 fps11 fps
Readout≈55 ms≈20 ms
Max ISO12,80032,000
StabilisationIn-bodyIn-body
Video6.2K 30p4K 120p (crop)
Weather sealedYesYes
ViewfinderElectronicElectronic
Weight557 g493 g
BatteryFujifilm NP-W235Sony NP-FZ100
Card slots2× SD (UHS-II)SD (UHS-II)
New price£1,549£1,329
Used at MPB£1,059–1,369£1,089–1,219
Native lenses in our database36 (23 third-party)105 (82 third-party)

Which is better for…

UseBetter choice
Beginner-friendlyAbout equal
Everyday & travelAbout equal
PortraitsAbout equal
LandscapeX-T5
Wildlife & animalsAlpha A6700
Sports & actionAlpha A6700
AstrophotographyAbout equal
Vlogging & videoAlpha A6700
Vintage / film lookX-T5

Based on the specs that matter most for each type of photography: burst and readout for action, resolution for landscapes, sensor size and low light for portraits and astro, video and weight for vlogging.

Lenses and running costs

The X-T5 uses Fujifilm X (36 lenses in our database, 23 third-party) and the Alpha A6700 uses Sony E / FE (105 lenses, 82 third-party). Batteries: Fujifilm NP-W235 (about £45) vs Sony NP-FZ100 (about £65).

X-T5 compatible lenses → · Alpha A6700 compatible lenses → ·

Frequently asked questions

Is the Fujifilm X-T5 better than the Sony Alpha A6700?

It depends on your priorities. The X-T5 offers more resolution (40MP vs 26MP), faster bursts (15fps vs 11fps), a lower price (from £1,059); the Alpha A6700 offers faster sensor readout (≈20ms vs ≈55ms), a lighter body (493g vs 557g), stronger video (4K 120p (crop)).

Which is better for video, the X-T5 or the Alpha A6700?

The Alpha A6700 is stronger for video: X-T5 records 6.2K 30p, Alpha A6700 records 4K 120p (crop).

Which is cheaper, the X-T5 or the Alpha A6700?

The X-T5 costs £1,549 new and from £1,059 used at MPB; the Alpha A6700 costs £1,329 new and from £1,089 used (checked 5 November 2026).

Can I use Fujifilm X-T5 lenses on the Alpha A6700?

Not directly. The X-T5 uses Fujifilm X and the Alpha A6700 uses Sony E / FE; switching usually means new lenses or an adapter where one exists.

Related comparisons