Lens comparison · Fujifilm X · updated 5 November 2026
Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR vs Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4
Verdict
Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4 has more in its favour on paper. The Fujifilm lens is the mount maker's own, while the Viltrox is a third-party alternative.
Choose the XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR for
- weather sealing
Choose the AF 33mm f/1.4 for
- less weight (270g vs 360g)
- a lower price (about £150 vs £500)
| XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR | AF 33mm f/1.4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fujifilm | Viltrox |
| Focal length | 33mm | 33mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.4 |
| Weight | 360 g | 270 g |
| Stabilisation | No | No |
| Weather sealing | Yes | No |
| Filter size | 58mm | 52mm |
| Made for | APSC | APSC |
| New price | £799 | £249 |
| Used at MPB (Fujifilm X) | £434–£564 | £132–£174 |
More lens comparisons
See all Fujifilm X cameras and lenses.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR better than the Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4?
The XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR offers weather sealing; the AF 33mm f/1.4 offers less weight (270g vs 360g), a lower price (about £150 vs £500).
Which is better value, the XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR or the AF 33mm f/1.4?
On Fujifilm X, the Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4 costs about £150 against about £500 for the Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR (MPB used where listed, otherwise new; checked 5 November 2026).
Do both lenses fit the same cameras?
Both are available for Fujifilm X (and other mounts: Sony E / FE, Nikon Z). Both are made for crop sensors.