Fujifilm XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR vs Viltrox AF 27mm f/1.2 Pro
Fujifilm XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR has more in its favour on paper. The AF 27mm f/1.2 Pro gathers more light for low light and background blur; the XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR is lighter and cheaper. The Fujifilm lens is the mount maker's own, while the Viltrox is a third-party alternative.
Choose the XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR for
- less weight (84g vs 520g)
- a lower price (about £330 vs £350)
- weather sealing
Choose the AF 27mm f/1.2 Pro for
- a brighter maximum aperture (f/1.2, about 2.4 stops more light)
| XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR | AF 27mm f/1.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fujifilm | Viltrox |
| Focal length | 27mm | 27mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.2 |
| Weight | 84 g | 520 g |
| Stabilisation | No | No |
| Weather sealing | Yes | No |
| Filter size | 39mm | 62mm |
| Made for | APSC | APSC |
| New price | £399 | £399 |
| Used at MPB (Fujifilm X) | £294–£369 | £319–£384 |
More lens comparisons
See all Fujifilm X cameras and lenses.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Fujifilm XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR better than the Viltrox AF 27mm f/1.2 Pro?
The XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR offers less weight (84g vs 520g), a lower price (about £330 vs £350), weather sealing; the AF 27mm f/1.2 Pro offers a brighter maximum aperture (f/1.2, about 2.4 stops more light).
Which is better value, the XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR or the AF 27mm f/1.2 Pro?
On Fujifilm X, the Fujifilm XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR costs about £330 against about £350 for the Viltrox AF 27mm f/1.2 Pro (MPB used where listed, otherwise new; checked 5 November 2026).
Is f/1.2 worth it over f/2.8?
f/1.2 gathers about 2.4 stops more light, which helps indoors, at night and for background blur. If you mostly shoot in good light, the slower lens is usually lighter and cheaper.
Do both lenses fit the same cameras?
Both are available for Fujifilm X (and other mounts: Sony E / FE). Both are made for crop sensors.